About Me

Name: wazzuprof
Location: Pullman, WA
Biography
Loading...

another head in the sand lefty academic type

TOWN CRIER III: Paranoia is never a healthy lifestyle

Terry Keller

Posted on: Wednesday, October 28, 2009


Keller
 

For some time, I've been dimly aware of a climate of fear in this country.

After 9/11 and government rhetoric about terror, which led to the wars on terror and on/in Iraq, fear proliferated. E-mails about Hitler's henchmen using fear to control the German people appeared. Statements, such as FDR's, "We have nothing to fear but fear itself," were quoted as a counter to the fear propaganda.

I knew all this, but wasn't aware of how much fear colored my daily life until we spent a year in Denmark. Denmark's Mohammed cartoon debacle in the spring of 2006 gave us pause, but we went anyway. We'd never been to Europe and yearned to experience it, but a bigger reason for going was to give us, and our children, another perspective by living outside of the United States.

Our Copenhagen apartment had no television. Our Danish was pathetic. A scan of the daily papers delivered to our doorstep often resulted in hilarious mistranslations - such as a waterfowl massacre in the nearby moat (likely about bird flu). Our intake of news dwindled. Occasionally, we read English news via the Internet. Mostly, we were news-free.

The burden of fear that hangs over us in the United States gradually lifted. Fears of a terrorist attack or other disaster fell away. We didn't fear that someone might walk into the kids' school with a gun and open fire, or that we'd be mugged walking along the pedestrian shopping streets. Health care was provided, public transportation was plentiful, grocery stores were adequate. We relaxed and enjoyed the city. We admired the sailboats zigzagging across the strait, the rhododendrons blooming for a good six weeks in spring, Van Gogh's brilliant sunflowers. We delighted in organ concerts in neighborhood churches, lit candles in the long winter nights.

No, everything was not perfect. Our kids had their share of teenage angst and rebellion. Our apartment was across the street from Christiania, that 1960s enclave where marijuana and hashish are legal. We lived through the tear gas and smoke of the March riots and car burnings that occurred a block away and outside our front door. And yet, it wasn't until we returned to the United States that I realized how much we'd escaped the fear and paranoia of this country. Here fear of terrorist attacks, coded in fiery colors of yellow, orange and red, is a base over which lies the fear of our kids dying in countries that have ambivalent reactions to their presence.

We fear running out of oil or not being able to pay for heat and transportation. We fear too much immigration, and too little job security, pension plans, health care and Social Security. Interest groups vie for our allegiance to their particular bogeyman. This level of fear-thinking is exhausting.

I'm wondering now how we escaped it while in Denmark. Was it simply avoiding broadcast news? Or was it that we immersed ourselves in art, culture and another society and that our concerns became basic - communication and navigation in foreign languages and systems? Or did a less frightened approach to life rub off on us? Whatever it was, and I'm guessing all of the above, the issue is how to maintain that fear-less existence here. For one, I'll avoid the TV evening news and disaster shows and pronouncements from on high about terror levels.

Is that a head-in-the-sand approach? I prefer to think of it as looking above the layers of fear to the joy and creativity that make life worth living. As FDR said, in his inaugural speech of 1933, during the calamity of the Depression, " the only thing we have to fear is fear itself -- nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes " To paraphrase more of his speech, nature is still providing for us and happiness lies in achievement, creativity and helping one another.

Surely, that's a much better way to live.

Terry Keller is a writer, musician and community volunteer who lives in rural Palouse with her husband and two children. Her interests include travel, gardening cooking, international connections and theology. Town Crier III is a weekly series of columns contributed by 13 local writers. The Town Crier columns run on Wednesday.

More Opinion Articles:



Sponsored Links

Suprise her with flowers!
Let her know how you feel
Fuch's Flowers: 758-9817
www.fuchsflowers.com

Banner Bank-Serving The NW!
3 Valley Locations: Clarkston
21st Street, & Bryden Branches
www.bannerbank.com

Find Local Business Now!
http://profiles.dnews.com

Advertise Here

Comment Section

  • score: 2  down  up wsuprof wrote on 10/28/2009 7:05 pm:

    I would not want my children to live in fear, but when a person grows up, it is correct for some to become aware that the natural world and a world that has evil people is not all warm fuzzies. True, some adults will not be able to handle reality and they can opt out, but I’m afraid many on the left equate “realism” with “paranoia”.

    Consider the adults who jump into the polar bear cage at the Berlin Zoo to swim with Knut? The idea that the natural world has predators does not comport with the rosy picture of cuddly mother earth.

    General Patten ran away and vomited after they entered the first concentration camps. They had intelligence and reports, but it was impossible for them to fathom human evil because it is so far away from normal human experience.

    So it may not be a big deal to brave the streets of Denmark or live in Haight Ashbury. But in Iran, if you want to protest an election, keep in mind that women are raped before they are executed so that they do not go to “heaven”. If you are living among the evil, absence of paranoia is just one thing: plain stupid.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

First posting, more to come

Imagine being a conservative in a small university town, where the intelligentia permeate local politics and society.  It can be pretty surreal. Few Americans want their fellow Americans to be discriminated against, particularly racial minorities and the LGBT types, and here in rural Eastern Washington we don't have a lot of the whips and leather folks. Is gay rights an issue out here in wheat country? You bet. Here is the editorial from the opinion editor of the local paper.  This blog will keep bringing you the uber psycho babble that one can experience when living in an island of liberal freak views surrounded by American Heartland.
 
 

OUR VIEW: Approval of R-71 is a vote for equal rights

Posted on: Friday, October 23, 2009

We urge voters to approve Referendum 71 when marking their Washington ballots.

R-71 affirms Senate Bill 5688, which was passed by the Washington Legislature earlier this year.

SB 5688 is the latest of the state's domestic partnership laws. It expands the rights and protections of state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partnerships.

Many dedicated men and woman worked long and hard to get the Legislature to enact the laws that remove second-class status from those who are in a committed relationship and cannot marry - legally or otherwise - in the state.

Such laws are important steps in the social evolution of the state.

Opponents of SB 5688 fear the bill will destroy the idea of marriage as being between a man and woman. They pushed hard for the referendum in the hope it will be rejected, thus removing SB 5688 from the books.

SB 5688 has nothing to do with marriage. It will not legalize gay marriage.

The bill, however, has everything to do with extending rights enjoyed by those who are married to those in a committed relationship. And rightly so.

Without such protections, same-sex couples would have little say in end-of-life decisions if a partner became terminally ill. Employment benefits such as insurance or pensions would not be available as they are to a married couple.

Seniors in a relationship also need similar protections, especially if marriage would penalize them financially. Social Security is a good example.

Often it proves prudent for a couple to remain single in order to retain higher individual monthly checks. If that couple married, the total of their checks would be less. Under SB 5688, they can remain officially single and have the same rights as a married couple.

Approval of R-71 will not bring the state to brink of moral stagnation, as some suggest. Just the opposite, it will keep the state on the forefront of equal rights.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »